Processor fee exceeds the settlement schedule

Material amount: EUR 325.00
Review priority: LOW
Demo owner: Maya Chen
Age at resolution: 4 days
Case version: v2 · Frozen

Interactive review rehearsal. Inspect evidence and prepare an unsaved next-step packet. The shared demo stays read-only. Leaving or reloading this case clears your rehearsal.

Investigate the exception

Preserved deterministic finding

Review a recorded outcome and its evidence limitations.

The bank net amount reconciles to the PSP settlement, but the explicit EUR 325.00 fee is EUR 75.00 above the configured schedule for this payout band.

Why this case needs attention

This case has a historical human resolution. The supporting remittance note is mentioned in history but is not attached to this demo.

psp-po-8422bank-line-861

Source record IDs are preserved; this view does not rerun or alter matching rules.

Evidence desk

Inspect the values. Follow their origin.

0/2 reviewed

Select a field to inspect its lineage. Marking it reviewed includes it in your rehearsal packet; it does not validate or repair the source.

PSP

PSP recorded fee

EUR 325.00

Source lineage: Northstar PSP settlement · row 8 · fee_amount
Record: psp-po-8422
Canonical field: fee_amount
Evidence reference: ev-fee-psp

I reviewed this field and its source.Local rehearsal only; not an audit event.

Review lens

Compare the explicit recorded fee and configured schedule.
Read the recorded decision separately from the evidence actually available here.

Prewritten advisory example · Not a live AI call

Working hypothesis, not a conclusion.

strong evidence

Suggested pattern: fee variance. Evidence strength describes support, not a probability of correctness.

The recorded fee is EUR 75.00 above the configured schedule amount.

What is still unknown

The historical decision is preserved, but its referenced attachment is absent. The demo cannot independently substantiate the commercial basis of the charge.

Next checks suggested by the example

Confirm whether the payout included an approved reserve or dispute charge.

The variance is explicit, but the current files do not identify its commercial basis.

Ready to outline the next step?
Missing evidence stays visible in the review packet.